State v. Jarrett

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Jarrett

881 N.E.2d 861, 117 Ohio St. 3d 70

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 13, 2008

DocketNo. 2006-0842

StatusPublished

This text of 881 N.E.2d 861 (State v. Jarrett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Jarrett, 881 N.E.2d 861, 117 Ohio St. 3d 70 (Ohio 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The certified question is answered in our opinion in State v. Crager, 116 Ohio St.3d 369, 2007-Ohio-6840, 879 N.E.2d 745. The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Crager, and the judgment of the trial court is reinstated.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents. Cupp, J., not participating. Edwin A. Pierce, Auglaize County Prosecuting Attorney, and Amy Otley Fox, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The certified question is answered in our opinion in State v. Crager, 116 Ohio St.3d 369, 2007-Ohio-6840, 879 N.E.2d 745. The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Crager, and the judgment of the trial court is reinstated.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents. Cupp, J., not participating. Edwin A. Pierce, Auglaize County Prosecuting Attorney, and Amy Otley Fox, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

881 N.E.2d 861, 117 Ohio St. 3d 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jarrett-ohio-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack