State v. Jarquis D. Jackson

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 21, 2015
Docket05-14-00279-CR
StatusPublished

This text of State v. Jarquis D. Jackson (State v. Jarquis D. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Jarquis D. Jackson, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

RECORD RETENTION FORM - CRIMINAL CASES

Appellate Cause No.: 05-14-00278/00279-CR

Style: The State of Texas V. Jarquis D. Jackson

County: Dallas

Published: No

Case Disposition & Date: Reversed and Remanded 1/21/15

Description/Subject of Case: Unlawfully carrying a weapon and possession of marijuana

RECOMMENDATION: [XX] Destroy [] Retain (Keep only opinions that fall under archive retention criteria - see list below)

[] The sentence imposed in the criminal case is more than 20 years confinement. (In the event there are companion cases, if the sentence in any case is more than 20 years, the records of all companion cases must be retained.)

[ ] The case involves a sex offense and the defendant is sentenced to the penitentiary for that offense.

[ ] The appeal involves a ruling on a motion for post-conviction DNA testing under chapter 64 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure and the record of an appeal of the underlying conviction was or would have been designated for retention (i.e., sentence(s) more than 20 years confinement; sex offense in which defendant sentenced to prison).

[ ] The opinion in the case is published.

[ ] The case contains unique information regarding local history, public figures (including victims, complainants, or witnesses), local events, or there are aspects of the case which are particularly notorious;

[ ] The records, in the opinion of the clerk or other person designated by the Court, contain highly concentrated, unique, and valuable information unlikely to be found in any other source available to researchers;

[ ] The records have been determined to be archival state records;

[ ] The records are indexes, original opinions, minutes, and general court dockets which have not been microfilmed.

SIGNED: _/s/ Molly Francis_________________________

DATE: 1/21/15 SERIES NO.: _______________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Jarquis D. Jackson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jarquis-d-jackson-texapp-2015.