State v. . Jarman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Jarman

141 S.E. 927, 195 N.C. 857, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 229

DecidedMarch 14, 1928

StatusPublished

This text of 141 S.E. 927 (State v. . Jarman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. . Jarman, 141 S.E. 927, 195 N.C. 857, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 229 (N.C. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Oueiam.

The defendant was found guilty of aiding and abetting in the manufacture of intoxicating liquors. The defendant made a motion for judgment of nonsuit at the close of the State’s evidence and at the conclusion of all the evidence. C. S., 4643. These motions were refused by the court below, and in this we think there was no error.

Without reciting the evidence on the part of the State, we think it was sufficient to be submitted to the jury.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Oueiam.

The defendant was found guilty of aiding and abetting in the manufacture of intoxicating liquors. The defendant made a motion for judgment of nonsuit at the close of the State’s evidence and at the conclusion of all the evidence. C. S., 4643. These motions were refused by the court below, and in this we think there was no error.

Without reciting the evidence on the part of the State, we think it was sufficient to be submitted to the jury.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

141 S.E. 927, 195 N.C. 857, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jarman-nc-1928.