State v. Janssen

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Janssen

528 S.W.3d 478

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 26, 2017·No. WD 80159·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Richard Janssen appeals his convictions of the class C felony of possession of a controlled substance, section 195.202, RSMo Noncum. Supp. 2014, and the class A misdemeanor of unlawful use of drug paraphernalia, section 195.238, RSMo Non-cum. Supp. 2014, and sentences of seven years imprisonment and ninety days of jail incarceration, respectively. He contends that insufficient evidence was presented to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he had possession of the controlled substance and paraphernalia. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment of convictions is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Richard Janssen appeals his convictions of the class C felony of possession of a controlled substance, section 195.202, RSMo Noncum. Supp. 2014, and the class A misdemeanor of unlawful use of drug paraphernalia, section 195.238, RSMo Non-cum. Supp. 2014, and sentences of seven years imprisonment and ninety days of jail incarceration, respectively. He contends that insufficient evidence was presented to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he had possession of the controlled substance and paraphernalia. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment of convictions is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Janssen, 528 S.W.3d 478 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

528 S.W.3d 478 (State v. Janssen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.