State v. Janoski

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Janoski

842 S.W.2d 576, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1856, 1992 WL 365509

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 15, 1992·No. No. 61845·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for stealing property with a value of at least $150, § 570.080, RSMo 1986. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for stealing property with a value of at least $150, § 570.080, RSMo 1986. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Janoski, 842 S.W.2d 576, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1856, 1992 WL 365509 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

842 S.W.2d 576 (State v. Janoski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.