State v. Jamieson
62 S.E.2d 52, 232 N.C. 731, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 613
Opinion
Defendant, having entered plea of nolo contendere to the charge against him, finds himself in like situation to that of defendant in S. v. Shepherd, 230 N.C. 605, 55 S.E. 2d 79. His plea, for purposes of judgment and disposition, has the same effect as a plea of guilty. Hence as in the Shepherd ease the judgment must be, and it is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Jamieson, 62 S.E.2d 52, 232 N.C. 731, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 613 (N.C. 1950).
62 S.E.2d 52 (State v. Jamieson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Norman
170 S.E.2d 923 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1969)
State v. Norman
169 S.E.2d 256 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1969)
Winesett v. Scheidt
79 S.E.2d 501 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1954)
State v. Cooper
77 S.E.2d 695 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
State v. Thomas
72 S.E.2d 525 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)