State v. Jamie Shannon Prater

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
DecidedSeptember 22, 1999
Docket01C01-9808-CC-00349
StatusPublished

This text of State v. Jamie Shannon Prater (State v. Jamie Shannon Prater) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Jamie Shannon Prater, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE FILED AUGUST 1999 SESSION September 22, 1999

Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Court Clerk STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) ) NO. 01C01-9808-CC-00349 Appellee, ) ) RUTHERFORD COUNTY ) No. F-42542B VS. ) ) HON. JAMES K. CLAYTON, JR., JAMIE SHANNON PRATER, ) JUDGE ) Appellant. ) (Possession of Marijuana with Intent ) to Sell or Deliver)

FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE:

LIONEL R. BARRETT, JR. PAUL G. SUMMERS 207 Third Avenue, North - Third Floor Attorney General and Reporter P.O. Box 190599 Nashville, TN 37219-0599 LUCIAN D. GEISE Assistant Attorney General Cordell Hull Building, 2nd Floor 425 Fifth Avenue North Nashville, TN 37243-0493

WILLIAM C. WHITESELL, JR. District Attorney General

THOMAS F. JACKSON, JR. Assistant District Attorney General 303 Rutherford Co. Judicial Bldg. Murfreesboro, TN 37130

OPINION FILED:

AFFIRMED - RULE 20 ORDER

JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE ORDER

Defendant, JAMIE SHANNON PRATER, pled guilty to possession of

marijuana with intent to sell or deliver, a Class E felony, and possession of drug

paraphernalia, a Class A misdemeanor. The trial court sentenced defendant to two

years on the felony and six months on the misdemeanor, to be served concurrently.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in ordering defendant

to serve 60 days in the county jail prior to release on probation for the balance of

the two-year sentence. We AFFIRM the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule

20, Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals.

The record shows that defendant has prior convictions for burglary and felony

theft in Dickson County, and was on probation when he committed the current

offense. He has numerous prior misdemeanor convictions, many prior

incarcerations, and a prior revocation of probation. Nevertheless, defendant argues

that ten days service is the appropriate sentence and would “better serve the

principles set forth in the Sentencing Act.” We respectfully disagree.

The record overwhelmingly supports the trial court’s imposition of sixty days

confinement rather than ten days. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the judgment of

the trial court be AFFIRMED pursuant to Rule 20, Tennessee Court of Criminal

Appeals.

In the event the appellant indicates an intention to file an application for

permission to appeal to the Tennessee Supreme Court, he may be admitted to bail

in the additional amount of $2,500, for a total amount of $6,000, with sufficient

sureties to be approved by the clerk of the trial court pending filing and disposition

of said application. In default of such bond, he shall be remanded to the custody

of the Sheriff of Rutherford County.

2 Costs of appeal are taxed to the appellant, JAMIE SHANNON PRATER, for

which let execution issue.

So ordered. Enter:

_______________________ JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE

CONCUR:

____________________________ DAVID G. HAYES, JUDGE

____________________________ L.T. LAFFERTY, SENIOR JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Jamie Shannon Prater, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jamie-shannon-prater-tenncrimapp-1999.