State v. Jamie Shannon Prater
This text of State v. Jamie Shannon Prater (State v. Jamie Shannon Prater) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
AT NASHVILLE FILED AUGUST 1999 SESSION September 22, 1999
Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Court Clerk STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) ) NO. 01C01-9808-CC-00349 Appellee, ) ) RUTHERFORD COUNTY ) No. F-42542B VS. ) ) HON. JAMES K. CLAYTON, JR., JAMIE SHANNON PRATER, ) JUDGE ) Appellant. ) (Possession of Marijuana with Intent ) to Sell or Deliver)
FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE:
LIONEL R. BARRETT, JR. PAUL G. SUMMERS 207 Third Avenue, North - Third Floor Attorney General and Reporter P.O. Box 190599 Nashville, TN 37219-0599 LUCIAN D. GEISE Assistant Attorney General Cordell Hull Building, 2nd Floor 425 Fifth Avenue North Nashville, TN 37243-0493
WILLIAM C. WHITESELL, JR. District Attorney General
THOMAS F. JACKSON, JR. Assistant District Attorney General 303 Rutherford Co. Judicial Bldg. Murfreesboro, TN 37130
OPINION FILED:
AFFIRMED - RULE 20 ORDER
JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE ORDER
Defendant, JAMIE SHANNON PRATER, pled guilty to possession of
marijuana with intent to sell or deliver, a Class E felony, and possession of drug
paraphernalia, a Class A misdemeanor. The trial court sentenced defendant to two
years on the felony and six months on the misdemeanor, to be served concurrently.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in ordering defendant
to serve 60 days in the county jail prior to release on probation for the balance of
the two-year sentence. We AFFIRM the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule
20, Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals.
The record shows that defendant has prior convictions for burglary and felony
theft in Dickson County, and was on probation when he committed the current
offense. He has numerous prior misdemeanor convictions, many prior
incarcerations, and a prior revocation of probation. Nevertheless, defendant argues
that ten days service is the appropriate sentence and would “better serve the
principles set forth in the Sentencing Act.” We respectfully disagree.
The record overwhelmingly supports the trial court’s imposition of sixty days
confinement rather than ten days. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the judgment of
the trial court be AFFIRMED pursuant to Rule 20, Tennessee Court of Criminal
Appeals.
In the event the appellant indicates an intention to file an application for
permission to appeal to the Tennessee Supreme Court, he may be admitted to bail
in the additional amount of $2,500, for a total amount of $6,000, with sufficient
sureties to be approved by the clerk of the trial court pending filing and disposition
of said application. In default of such bond, he shall be remanded to the custody
of the Sheriff of Rutherford County.
2 Costs of appeal are taxed to the appellant, JAMIE SHANNON PRATER, for
which let execution issue.
So ordered. Enter:
_______________________ JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE
CONCUR:
____________________________ DAVID G. HAYES, JUDGE
____________________________ L.T. LAFFERTY, SENIOR JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Jamie Shannon Prater, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jamie-shannon-prater-tenncrimapp-1999.