State v. James

Court of Appeals of South Carolina·Decided June 27, 2018·No. 2018-UP-284·Unpublished

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Leon Amos Jason James, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2016-001155

Appeal From Bamberg County Roger M. Young, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-284 Submitted May 1, 2018 – Filed June 27, 2018

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia, and Leon A. J. James, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY, C.J., and WILLIAMS and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. James, (S.C. Ct. App. 2018).

State v. James (State v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)