State v. James Robert Flores
Opinion
APPELLANT
APPELLEE
PER CURIAM
This purports to be an appeal from an order of the county court at law granting appellee's motion for new trial. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.01(a)(3) (West Supp. 1993). The underlying offense is assault. Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.01 (West Supp. 1993).
The transcript received by this Court on May 7, 1993, does not contain an order granting a new trial in this cause. The Clerk of this Court notified counsel for the State that a supplemental transcript containing a copy of the order appealed from should be tendered for filing on or before May 25, 1993. No supplemental transcript has been received, nor has the State requested an extension of time for filing. The statement of facts, which was due June 1, 1993, has not been received and, again, the State has not timely requested an extension of time for filing.
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. State v. Sanchez, 764 S.W.2d 920 (Tex. App.--Austin 1989, no pet.).
[Before Justices Powers, Kidd and B. A. Smith]
Appeal Dismissed
Filed: June 23, 1993
[Do Not Publish]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. James Robert Flores (State v. James Robert Flores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.