State v. James

766 N.E.2d 999, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1433, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 1037
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 25, 2002·No. 2002- 0228·Published

Opinion

Franklin App. Nos. 00AP-1174 and 00AP-1175, 2001-0hio-4091. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and a claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due April 19, 2002, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this case with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is dismissed, sua sponte.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. James, 766 N.E.2d 999, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1433, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 1037 (Ohio 2002).

766 N.E.2d 999 (State v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.