State v. . James

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . James

13 S.E. 112, 108 N.C. 792

DecidedFebruary 5, 1891

StatusPublished

This text of 13 S.E. 112 (State v. . James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. . James, 13 S.E. 112, 108 N.C. 792 (N.C. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

This case was tried at Spring Term, 1890, of ALEXANDER. The appeal was docketed here at Fall Term, 1890. There was no application for certiorari at that term (Pittman v. Kimberly, 92 N.C. 562), and no excuse is shown for the delay. Under the repeated decisions of this Court, we must direct the entry to be made.

Appeal dismissed.

Cited: Sondley v. Asheville, 110 N.C. 90; Graham v. Edwards,114 N.C. 230; Burrell v. Hughes, 120 N.C. 279; Norwood v. Pratt,124 N.C. 747; Benedict v. Jones, 131 N.C. 475; Mirror Co. v. Casualty Co.,157 N.C. 30; McLean v. McDonald, 175 N.C. 419; Howard v. Speight,180 N.C. 654.

(793)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This case was tried at Spring Term, 1890, of ALEXANDER. The appeal was docketed here at Fall Term, 1890. There was no application for certiorari at that term (Pittman v. Kimberly, 92 N.C. 562), and no excuse is shown for the delay. Under the repeated decisions of this Court, we must direct the entry to be made.

Appeal dismissed.

Cited: Sondley v. Asheville, 110 N.C. 90; Graham v. Edwards,114 N.C. 230; Burrell v. Hughes, 120 N.C. 279; Norwood v. Pratt,124 N.C. 747; Benedict v. Jones, 131 N.C. 475; Mirror Co. v. Casualty Co.,157 N.C. 30; McLean v. McDonald, 175 N.C. 419; Howard v. Speight,180 N.C. 654.

(793)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 S.E. 112, 108 N.C. 792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-james-nc-1891.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack