State v. James
108 N.C. 792
Opinion
This case was tried at Spring Term, 1890, of Alexander Superior Court The appeal was not docketed here at Fall Term, 1890. There was no application for cer-tiorari at that term (Pittman v. Kimberly, 92 N. C., 562), and no excuse is shown for the delay. Under the repeated decisions .of this Court, we must direct the entry to be made.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. James, 108 N.C. 792 (N.C. 1891).
108 N.C. 792 (State v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Norwood v. . Pratt
32 S.E. 979 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1899)