State v. James

426 S.W.3d 17, 2014 WL 1226270, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 325
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 25, 2014·No. No. ED 99577·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Travis A. James (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury for one count of possession of a controlled substance, heroin, with intent to deliver, in violation of Section 195.211.1 Defendant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to a term of 20 years’ imprisonment, to be served concurrently with a sentence Defendant was already serving. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. James, 426 S.W.3d 17, 2014 WL 1226270, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 325 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

426 S.W.3d 17 (State v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.