State v. James

147 S.W.3d 906, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1695, 2004 WL 2513796
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. James. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1595
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 9, 2004·No. No. WD 63169·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Fernandez James appeals the judgment of his conviction, after a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, of trafficking drugs in the second degree, § 195.223. As a result of his conviction, the appellant was sentenced, as a prior drug offender, § 195.275, to a term of imprisonment of ten years in the Missouri Department of Corrections, with no chance of parole, § 195.295.3.

In his sole point on appeal, the appellant claims that the trial court erred in overruling his pre-trial motion to suppress and admitting at trial, over his objection, the crack cocaine seized and any testimony relating to it, because the evidence sought to be suppressed was the fruit of an unlawful search and seizure.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 30.2503).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. James, 147 S.W.3d 906, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1695, 2004 WL 2513796 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

147 S.W.3d 906 (State v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.