State v. James
This text of 576 S.W.2d 758 (State v. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A jury found defendant Danny James guilty of second degree burglary (§ 560.045, RSMo 1969), and he has appealed from the ensuing judgment imposing two years’ imprisonment.
Defendant’s only point is that the evidence was insufficient. Police saw and arrested defendant and two others as they were running out the door of the burglarized premises. A chain and lock were cut and the contents were in disarray. Among the missing items were five “Bic” pens and a pass key seized from the defendant’s person.
In support of his contention of insufficient evidence, in his brief defendant argues the evidence showed only his presence at the scene of the burglary. This ignores the state’s evidence that when arrested defendant had the stolen objects in his possession.
The evidence of the burglarious entry, defendant’s presence, his attempted flight, and his possession of stolen goods were sufficient to support his guilty verdict. Compare State v. Myers, 551 S.W.2d 312[1](Mo.App.1977).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
576 S.W.2d 758, 1979 Mo. App. LEXIS 2747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-james-moctapp-1979.