State v. James

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. James

180 So. 3d 183, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17254, 2015 WL 7280672

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 18, 2015

DocketNo. 3D14-1242

StatusPublished

This text of 180 So. 3d 183 (State v. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. James, 180 So. 3d 183, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17254, 2015 WL 7280672 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Tillman v. State, 471 So.2d 32, 35 (Fla.1985) (“In order to be preserved, for further review by a higher court, an issue must be presented to the lower court and the specific legal argument or ground to be argued on appeal or review must be part of that presentation .if it is to be. considered preserved.”); State v. Taylor, 826 So.2d 399, 406 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (“An argument against suppression may not be presented for the first time on appeal.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Tillman v. State, 471 So.2d 32, 35 (Fla.1985) (“In order to be preserved, for further review by a higher court, an issue must be presented to the lower court and the specific legal argument or ground to be argued on appeal or review must be part of that presentation .if it is to be. considered preserved.”); State v. Taylor, 826 So.2d 399, 406 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (“An argument against suppression may not be presented for the first time on appeal.”).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 So. 3d 183, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17254, 2015 WL 7280672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-james-fladistctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack