State v. James
180 So. 3d 183, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17254, 2015 WL 7280672
Opinion
Affirmed. See Tillman v. State, 471 So.2d 32, 35 (Fla.1985) (“In order to be preserved, for further review by a higher court, an issue must be presented to the lower court and the specific legal argument or ground to be argued on appeal or review must be part of that presentation .if it is to be. considered preserved.”); State v. Taylor, 826 So.2d 399, 406 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (“An argument against suppression may not be presented for the first time on appeal.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. James, 180 So. 3d 183, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17254, 2015 WL 7280672 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).
180 So. 3d 183 (State v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Taylor
826 So. 2d 399 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Tillman v. State
471 So. 2d 32 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)