State v. James

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. James

782 A.2d 1249, 258 Conn. 912, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 409

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedSeptember 20, 2001

DocketSC 16591

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 782 A.2d 1249 (State v. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. James, 782 A.2d 1249, 258 Conn. 912, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 409 (Colo. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 64 Conn. App. 495 (AC 19910), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Was the Appellate Court correct in refusing to incorporate the inquiry of Lozada v. Deeds, 498 U.S. 430, 432, 111 S. Ct. 860, 112 L. Ed. 2d 956 (1991), into the abuse of discretion standard of review of denials of state requests for permission to appeal?

“2. If not, was the Appellate Court nevertheless correct in dismissing the state’s appeal?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 64 Conn. App. 495 (AC 19910), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Was the Appellate Court correct in refusing to incorporate the inquiry of Lozada v. Deeds, 498 U.S. 430, 432, 111 S. Ct. 860, 112 L. Ed. 2d 956 (1991), into the abuse of discretion standard of review of denials of state requests for permission to appeal?

“2. If not, was the Appellate Court nevertheless correct in dismissing the state’s appeal?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

782 A.2d 1249, 258 Conn. 912, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-james-conn-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack