State v. James

197 A.2d 935, 150 Conn. 730
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJune 25, 1963
StatusPublished

This text of 197 A.2d 935 (State v. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. James, 197 A.2d 935, 150 Conn. 730 (Colo. 1963).

Opinion

The petition by the defendant for certification for appeal from the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court is denied on the ground that (1) it was conceded that the judgment file offered was the original judgment file and (2) the defect in the original judgment file, under the rule of cases such as Banach v. Bohinski, 107 Conn. 156, 139 A. 688, and State v. Leopold, 110 Conn. 55, 147 A. 118, was not raised in the trial court. Nothing herein is to be construed as approving the opinion of the Appellate Division so far as it is based on other grounds.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Leopold
147 A. 118 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1929)
Banach v. Bohinski
139 A. 688 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 A.2d 935, 150 Conn. 730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-james-conn-1963.