State v. Jamar D.

961 A.2d 423, 289 Conn. 959, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 559

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided December 11, 2008·No. SC 18277·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 29474) is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly dismiss the defendant’s appeal for lack of a final judgment?”

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

*960 Decided December 11, 2008 Denise B. Smoker, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 29474) is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly dismiss the defendant’s appeal for lack of a final judgment?”

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

*960 Decided December 11, 2008 Denise B. Smoker, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

State v. Jamar D., 961 A.2d 423, 289 Conn. 959, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 559 (Colo. 2008).

Pincite

961 A.2d 423 (State v. Jamar D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.