State v. Jacobson

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Jacobson

873 A.2d 999, 273 Conn. 928, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 163

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided April 21, 2005·No. SC 17415·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 87 Conn. App. 440 (AC 23983), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the improper introduction of fifty-three photographs, testimony regarding a ziplock bag of hair and testimony regarding the defendant’s prior misconduct constituted harmless error?”

[929] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17415. Norman A. Pattis, in support of the petition. Frederick W. Fawcett, supervisory assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided April 21, 2005

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 87 Conn. App. 440 (AC 23983), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the improper introduction of fifty-three photographs, testimony regarding a ziplock bag of hair and testimony regarding the defendant’s prior misconduct constituted harmless error?”

[929] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17415. Norman A. Pattis, in support of the petition. Frederick W. Fawcett, supervisory assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided April 21, 2005

State v. Jacobson, 873 A.2d 999, 273 Conn. 928, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 163 (Colo. 2005).

Pincite

873 A.2d 999 (State v. Jacobson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related