State v. Jacobs
This text of 673 S.E.2d 870 (State v. Jacobs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Curley JACOBS and Bruce Lee McMillian.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Derrick C. Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, L. Johnson Britt, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.
C. Scott Holmes, for Jacobs.
Lemuel W. Hinton, for McMillian.
Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 668 S.E.2d 346.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 21st day of November 2008 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2009."
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st day of November 2008 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2009."
Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
TIMMONS-GOODSON, J., recused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
673 S.E.2d 870, 2009 WL 425959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jacobs-nc-2009.