State v. Jacobs

298 S.W.3d 584, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1745, 2009 WL 4639510
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jacobs. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 217
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 8, 2009·No. ED 92645·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jerome Jacobs (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment upon his convictions by a jury of two counts of assault of emergency personnel in the third degree, Section 565.083, RSMo 2000, one count of property damage in the second degree, Section 569.120, RSMo 2000, one count of assault of a law enforcement officer in the third degree, Section 565.083, RSMo 2000, and one count of resisting or interfering with arrest, Section 575.150, RSMo 2000. Defendant contends the trial court erred (1) in admitting recordings of two anonymous 911 calls because the calls were inadmissible hearsay and prejudicial, and (2) in refusing to instruct the jury on self-defense on the charges for assaulting emergency personnel.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detañed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Jacobs, 298 S.W.3d 584, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1745, 2009 WL 4639510 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

298 S.W.3d 584 (State v. Jacobs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.