State v. Jacobs

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Jacobs

874 S.W.2d 506, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 382, 1994 WL 67143

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jacobs. Read the opinion of the Court — 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 59 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 8, 1994·No. Nos. 62831, 64519·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted defendant of felony stealing in violation of § 570.030, RSMo 1986. The court sentenced defendant to pay a fine of $1000. Defendant raises three points on direct appeal. He also raises two points concerning the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[507]*507The judgments are affirmed in accordance ■with Rule 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted defendant of felony stealing in violation of § 570.030, RSMo 1986. The court sentenced defendant to pay a fine of $1000. Defendant raises three points on direct appeal. He also raises two points concerning the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[507]*507The judgments are affirmed in accordance ■with Rule 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

State v. Jacobs, 874 S.W.2d 506, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 382, 1994 WL 67143 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

874 S.W.2d 506 (State v. Jacobs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.