State v. Jacobs

855 So. 2d 324, 2003 WL 22330979
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jacobs. Read the opinion of the Court — 803 So. 2d 933
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 10, 2003·No. No. 2003-KK-1539·Published

Opinion

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial [325]*325Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 96-7161; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 03-K-396.

Granted. The trial court afforded the defendant the contradictory hearing required under State v. Bernard, 608 So.2d 966, 973 (1992) when it ruled on the merits of defense motions nos. 86, 87, 88 on January 27, 2003. See State v. Miller, 99-0192, p. 27 (La.9/6/00), 776 So.2d 396, 412 (“The requirement of a pretrial determination of admissibility does not encompass an evi-dentiary hearing at which victim impact witnesses are called to testify.”). Accordingly, we remand the instant application to the court of appeal for treatment of the trial court’s denial of defense motions nos. 86, 87, 88 on the merits.

KNOLL, J., recused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Jacobs, 855 So. 2d 324, 2003 WL 22330979 (La. 2003).

855 So. 2d 324 (State v. Jacobs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Miller
776 So. 2d 396 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2000)
State v. Bernard
608 So. 2d 966 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1992)