State v. Jacobs
625 A.2d 822, 225 Conn. 920, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 153
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 340 (AC 10002), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, under the circumstances of this case, the fourth amendment exclusionary rule did not apply to these revocation of probation proceedings?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Jacobs, 625 A.2d 822, 225 Conn. 920, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 153 (Colo. 1993).
625 A.2d 822 (State v. Jacobs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Jacobs
641 A.2d 1351 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)
State v. Villano
634 A.2d 907 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1993)