State v. Jacob Meeks
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
AT JACKSON FILED AUGUST 1998 SESSION August 4, 1999
Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Court Clerk STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) C.C.A. NO. 02C01-9709-CC-00360 ) Appellee ) FAYETTE COUNTY ) v. ) HON. JON KERRY BLACKWOOD, ) JUDGE JACOB MEEKS, ) ) POST-CONVICTION Defendant/Appellant )
OPINION CONCURRING IN RESULTS ONLY
I concur with majority’s conclusion that the appellant must be denied post-
conviction relief and that therefore the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed.
However, I write separately to express my continued adherence to the position set
out in my dissenting opinion in the original appeal of this case. It is still my belief
that the failure of a trial court clerk to send a defendant the notice of withdrawal of
counsel after an initial appeal is merely a violation of a court rule, Rule 14 of the
Rules of the Tennessee Supreme Court, is not an error of constitutional magnitude
and cannot form the basis of post-conviction relief.
The judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED.
______________________________ JERRY L. SMITH, JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Jacob Meeks (State v. Jacob Meeks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.