State v. Jackson

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

3 Plaintiff-Appellee,

4 v. No. A-1-CA-35218

5 RODNEY LAMAR JACKSON,

6 Defendant-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF OTERO COUNTY 8 James Waylon Counts, District Judge

9 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 10 Santa Fe, NM

11 for Appellee

12 Law Offices of Jennifer J. Wernersbach, PC 13 Jennifer J. Wernersbach 14 Albuquerque, NM

15 for Appellant

16 MEMORANDUM OPINION

17 SUTIN, Judge. 1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the second notice

2 of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance

3 has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.

4 {2} AFFIRMED.

5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 __________________________________ 7 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

8 WE CONCUR:

9 ___________________________________ 10 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

11 ___________________________________ 12 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge