State v. . Jackson
This text of 27 S.E.2d 445 (State v. . Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was not tried upon either warrant in the County Criminal Court; hence the defendant challenged the jurisdiction of the Superior Court. However, when the respective cases were called in the County Criminal Court, the defendant demanded a trial by jury; whereupon the cases were transferred to the Superior Court. This procedure, upon a request for a jury trial by the State or defendant, being mandatory under the provisions of chapter 303, Public Laws ■of 1941, it is now conceded by the defendant that the procedure was proper and that the judgment in each case should be affirmed.
The judgment rendered below in each case is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 S.E.2d 445, 223 N.C. 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jackson-nc-1943.