State v. Jackson

516 S.W.3d 446, 2017 WL 1421212, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 311
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jackson. Read the opinion of the Court — 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 928
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 18, 2017·No. No. ED 103972·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Wayne T. Jackson appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of first-degree child molestation and first-degree statutory sodomy. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding certain evidence. State v. Taylor, 504 S.W.3d 116, 120 (Mo. App. E.D. 2016). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm [447]*447the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Jackson, 516 S.W.3d 446, 2017 WL 1421212, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 311 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

516 S.W.3d 446 (State v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Taylor
504 S.W.3d 116 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2016)