State v. Jackson
30 Me. 29
Opinion
— The rule in criminal trials is, that all material allegations in the indictment must be proved. The color and kind of animal alleged to be stolen, are made material by being set out in the indictment. Whether it was necessary to make such allegations, is not the question before us, but there is no doubt that, if found in the indictment, they must be proved. The principle in this State has been already settled in State v. Noble, 15 Maine, 446.
Exceptions sustained and, new trial granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Jackson, 30 Me. 29 (Me. 1849).
30 Me. 29 (State v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Grant
266 A.2d 232 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1970)
State v. Nelson
3 S.E.2d 530 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1939)
Alderman v. State
102 So. 737 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1924)
Smith v. State
76 So. 774 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1917)
State v. Wilson
157 P. 474 (Washington Supreme Court, 1916)
Lang v. State
42 Fla. 595 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1900)
Schayer v. People
5 Colo. App. 75 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1894)
Territory of Montana v. Rowand
8 Mont. 110 (Montana Supreme Court, 1888)
Morgan v. State
61 Ind. 447 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1878)
Hamilton v. State
60 Ind. 193 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1877)
Ranjel v. State
1 Tex. Ct. App. 461 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1876)
Warrington v. State
1 Tex. Ct. App. 168 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1876)
Greer v. State
50 Ind. 267 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1875)