State v. Jackson

531 So. 2d 1081, 1988 La. App. LEXIS 1821, 1988 WL 94878
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jackson. Read the opinion of the Court — 492 So. 2d 1265
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided September 16, 1988·No. No. KA-9110·Published

Opinion

SCHOTT, Judge.

In our examination of this record for errors patent we noted that defendant’s presence when the calling, examination, challenging, impaneling, and swearing of the jury took place was not reflected in the minutes. Pursuant to our order the trial judge has filed in the record a per curiam in which she certified that defendant was indeed present at all phases of the trial. We hold that this is sufficient to remedy the defect in the minute entry.

We find no errors patent and defendant has assigned no errors for our review. Accordingly, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Jackson, 531 So. 2d 1081, 1988 La. App. LEXIS 1821, 1988 WL 94878 (La. Ct. App. 1988).

531 So. 2d 1081 (State v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.