State v. Jackson

609 So. 2d 181, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12866, 1992 WL 379879
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jackson. Read the opinion of the Court — 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7322
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 23, 1992·No. No. 92-01585·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State of Florida appeals an order granting suppression of evidence. At the suppression hearing the evidence showed that as Tampa police officers arrived at a locale known for chronic drug dealing activity, the appellee and a companion took flight from the scene. During the ensuing chase, the officer pursuing the appellee saw him toss away an object which was, as described by the officer, big and dark. After the officer apprehended the appellee, a search of the vicinity where the object had been dropped resulted in discovery of a handgun which was the subject of the motion to suppress.

Based upon the above facts, we find this case indistinguishable from California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1547, 113 L.Ed.2d 690 (1991), and State v. Wilson, 595 So.2d 1106 (Fla. 1st DCA1992). Accordingly, we reverse the grant of suppression and remand this case for further proceedings.

DANAHY, A.C.J., HALL, J., and ROBERTS, SUSAN W., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Jackson, 609 So. 2d 181, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12866, 1992 WL 379879 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

609 So. 2d 181 (State v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

California v. Hodari D.
499 U.S. 621 (Supreme Court, 1991)
State v. Wilson
595 So. 2d 1106 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)