State v. Jackson
513 So. 2d 797, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2411, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10618
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 14, 1987
DocketNo. 4-86-1965
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 513 So. 2d 797 (State v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Jackson, 513 So. 2d 797, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2411, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10618 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
Opinion
The State of Florida appeals from an order granting appellee’s motion to suppress evidence. The state contends that appellee’s motion to suppress fails to comply with the requirements of Rule 3.190(h)(2). We agree and reverse.
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.190(h)(2) provides:
Every motion to suppress evidence shall clearly state the particular evidence sought to be suppressed, the reasons for suppression and a general statement of the facts on which the motion is based. Since neither appellee’s motion nor the court’s order granting the motion identifies the items to be suppressed with particularity, we reverse the order granting appel-lee’s motion to suppress on the authority of State v. Breland, 421 So.2d 761 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). Also see State v. Hinton, 305 So.2d 804, 808 n. 2 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), and State v. Pezzella, 397 So.2d 1033 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. McCray
626 So. 2d 1017 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
State v. Leyva
599 So. 2d 691 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
513 So. 2d 797, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2411, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jackson-fladistctapp-1987.