State v. Jackson
This text of 569 A.2d 578 (State v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant appeals his conviction, after a jury trial, of violation of the state dependency producing drug law; General Statutes § 21a-278 (b); and claims that the trial court committed reversible error denying his motion to suppress illegally seized evidence.
Our review of the record and briefs, in light of our holdings in State v. Oliver, 17 Conn. App. 108, 550 A.2d 316 (1988); State v. Rodriguez, 14 Conn. App. 574, 542 A.2d 342 (1988); and State v. Williamson, 10 Conn. App. 532, 524 A.2d 655, cert. denied, 204 Conn. 801, 525 A.2d 965 (1987); clearly indicates that the defendant’s averment of error is without merit.
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
569 A.2d 578, 20 Conn. App. 824, 1990 Conn. App. LEXIS 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jackson-connappct-1990.