State v. J. V. S.

301 P.3d 977, 256 Or. App. 757
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMay 22, 2013
Docket120970239; A152704
StatusPublished

This text of 301 P.3d 977 (State v. J. V. S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. J. V. S., 301 P.3d 977, 256 Or. App. 757 (Or. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 60 days. ORS 426.130. She asserts that the state failed to prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that, because of a mental disorder, she is unable to provide for her basic personal needs. ORS 426.005(1)(e)(B). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse on that basis. Accordingly, we do not address appellant’s other, unpreserved assignment of error, in which she contends that the trial court erred in failing to advise her of the possible results of the commitment proceeding, as required by ORS 426.100(1)(c).

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 426.130
Oregon § 426.130
§ 426.005
Oregon § 426.005
§ 426.100
Oregon § 426.100

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
301 P.3d 977, 256 Or. App. 757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-j-v-s-orctapp-2013.