State v. J. P. (In re J. P.)

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. J. P. (In re J. P.)

424 P.3d 831, 293 Or. App. 604

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedAugust 29, 2018

DocketA166850

StatusPublished

This text of 424 P.3d 831 (State v. J. P. (In re J. P.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. J. P. (In re J. P.), 424 P.3d 831, 293 Or. App. 604 (Or. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

*832 *605The trial court committed appellant to the custody of the Oregon Health Authority after determining that he was a danger to himself and others because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(1)(f)(A). On appeal, appellant argues that the record does not contain legally sufficient evidence to support the involuntary commitment. The state concedes that the record is legally insufficient in that regard and that the order of commitment should be reversed. We agree and accept the state's concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

*832 *605The trial court committed appellant to the custody of the Oregon Health Authority after determining that he was a danger to himself and others because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(1)(f)(A). On appeal, appellant argues that the record does not contain legally sufficient evidence to support the involuntary commitment. The state concedes that the record is legally insufficient in that regard and that the order of commitment should be reversed. We agree and accept the state's concession.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

424 P.3d 831, 293 Or. App. 604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-j-p-in-re-j-p-orctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack