State v. J. L. M.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. J. L. M.

342 P.3d 1116, 268 Or. App. 714, 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 89

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJanuary 28, 2015

Docket14CC01917; A157843

StatusPublished

This text of 342 P.3d 1116 (State v. J. L. M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. J. L. M., 342 P.3d 1116, 268 Or. App. 714, 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 89 (Or. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. He assigns error to the trial court’s ruling that, because of a mental disorder, he was a danger to himself or was unable to provide for his basic needs. ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse the judgment of commitment.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. He assigns error to the trial court’s ruling that, because of a mental disorder, he was a danger to himself or was unable to provide for his basic needs. ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse the judgment of commitment.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

342 P.3d 1116, 268 Or. App. 714, 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-j-l-m-orctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack