State v. J. L. A.
333 P.3d 1176, 265 Or. App. 156
Opinion
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. He argues that, contrary to the trial court’s ruling, the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is a danger to himself. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the involuntary commitment and that the judgment cannot stand. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. J. L. A., 333 P.3d 1176, 265 Or. App. 156 (Or. Ct. App. 2014).
333 P.3d 1176 (State v. J. L. A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.