State v. J. L. A.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. J. L. A.

333 P.3d 1176, 265 Or. App. 156

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedAugust 20, 2014

DocketM1311004; A155795

StatusPublished

This text of 333 P.3d 1176 (State v. J. L. A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. J. L. A., 333 P.3d 1176, 265 Or. App. 156 (Or. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. He argues that, contrary to the trial court’s ruling, the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is a danger to himself. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the involuntary commitment and that the judgment cannot stand. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. He argues that, contrary to the trial court’s ruling, the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is a danger to himself. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the involuntary commitment and that the judgment cannot stand. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

333 P.3d 1176, 265 Or. App. 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-j-l-a-orctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack