State v. J. D. G. (In re J. D. G.)

436 P.3d 792, 296 Or. App. 754
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMarch 20, 2019
DocketA168808
StatusPublished

This text of 436 P.3d 792 (State v. J. D. G. (In re J. D. G.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. J. D. G. (In re J. D. G.), 436 P.3d 792, 296 Or. App. 754 (Or. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

*755Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days. See ORS 426.130. In her only assignment of error, appellant contends that the record does not contain legally sufficient evidence that, due to a mental disorder, she was unable to provide for her basic needs. See ORS 426.005(1)(f)(B). The state concedes that the evidence was insufficient to establish that appellant was unable to provide for her basic needs and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse the judgment.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 426.130
Oregon § 426.130
§ 426.005
Oregon § 426.005

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
436 P.3d 792, 296 Or. App. 754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-j-d-g-in-re-j-d-g-orctapp-2019.