Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. J. C.

State v. J. C.

206 P.3d 1101, 227 Or. App. 636, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 290
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedApril 22, 2009
Docket07ME019; A137273
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 206 P.3d 1101 (State v. J. C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. J. C., 206 P.3d 1101, 227 Or. App. 636, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 290 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is a danger to himself or unable to provide for his basic needs because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(1)(d). The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state’s concession and reverse.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. JC
206 P.3d 1101 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
206 P.3d 1101, 227 Or. App. 636, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-j-c-orctapp-2009.