State v. J. A. H.

202 P.3d 913, 225 Or. App. 684, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 60
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedFebruary 11, 2009
Docket080262139; A138437
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 202 P.3d 913 (State v. J. A. H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. J. A. H., 202 P.3d 913, 225 Or. App. 684, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 60 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The trial court entered an order of civil commitment, finding that appellant suffered from a mental disorder that caused her to be unable to meet her basic needs. Appellant contends that the record does not contain the required clear and convincing evidence to support the civil commitment. The state concedes the insufficiency of the evidence. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is insufficient.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. JAH
202 P.3d 913 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 P.3d 913, 225 Or. App. 684, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-j-a-h-orctapp-2009.