State v. Ivy

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Ivy

559 S.W.3d 113

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 16, 2018

DocketNo. ED 106008

StatusPublished

This text of 559 S.W.3d 113 (State v. Ivy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ivy, 559 S.W.3d 113 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Willie Ivy appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for multiple counts of child sexual abuse, claiming the court erred in denying his motion to sever certain counts from the others. We find no error and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Willie Ivy appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for multiple counts of child sexual abuse, claiming the court erred in denying his motion to sever certain counts from the others. We find no error and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

559 S.W.3d 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ivy-moctapp-2018.