State v. Ivy

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Ivy

559 S.W.3d 113

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Ivy. Read the opinion of the Court — 531 S.W.3d 108 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 16, 2018·No. No. ED 106008·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Willie Ivy appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for multiple counts of child sexual abuse, claiming the court erred in denying his motion to sever certain counts from the others. We find no error and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Willie Ivy appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for multiple counts of child sexual abuse, claiming the court erred in denying his motion to sever certain counts from the others. We find no error and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Ivy, 559 S.W.3d 113 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

559 S.W.3d 113 (State v. Ivy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.