State v. Itczak

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Itczak

149 A. 892, 111 Conn. 719, 1930 Conn. LEXIS 187

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided March 6, 1930·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

We have made an examination and comparison of the evidence and are convinced that the jury might reasonably have found the accused guilty as charged beyond a reasonable doubt. The evidence was conflicting, both upon the charge of the information and upon the accused’s defense of an alibi. Under these circumstances it was the province of the jury to resolve this conflict. We cannot hold that the verdict should have been set aside. State v. Chin Lung, 106 Conn. 701, 704, 139 Atl. 91; State v. Cianflone, 98 Conn. 454, 459, 120 Atl. 347.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

We have made an examination and comparison of the evidence and are convinced that the jury might reasonably have found the accused guilty as charged beyond a reasonable doubt. The evidence was conflicting, both upon the charge of the information and upon the accused’s defense of an alibi. Under these circumstances it was the province of the jury to resolve this conflict. We cannot hold that the verdict should have been set aside. State v. Chin Lung, 106 Conn. 701, 704, 139 Atl. 91; State v. Cianflone, 98 Conn. 454, 459, 120 Atl. 347.

There is no error.

State v. Itczak, 149 A. 892, 111 Conn. 719, 1930 Conn. LEXIS 187 (Colo. 1930).

Pincite

149 A. 892 (State v. Itczak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related