State v. Isaac Sastaita
This text of State v. Isaac Sastaita (State v. Isaac Sastaita) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NUMBER 13-14-00237-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
914400000
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant,
v.
ISAAC SASTAITA, Appellee.
On Appeal from the 105th District Court of Kleberg County, Texas.
ORDER
Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes Order Per Curiam
Appellant, the State of Texas, by and through the District Attorney in and for Kleberg County, Texas, has filed a motion for stay of proceedings in the above cause. On April 8, 2014, the trial court granted a motion to suppress evidence. The State has filed a notice of appeal and has requested a stay in the trial court's proceedings pending disposition of its appeal. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. § 44.01(a)(5), (e) (West Supp. 2011). The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion for stay of proceedings, is of the opinion that said motion should be granted. The motion for stay is hereby GRANTED, and the trial court's proceedings are hereby ordered STAYED pending disposition of the State's appeal. PER CURIAM
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Order delivered and filed this the 8[th] day of May, 2014.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Isaac Sastaita, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-isaac-sastaita-texapp-2014.