State v. Isaac

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Isaac

314 S.W.3d 348, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 264

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 9, 2010·No. No. ED 92878·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Harold D. Isaac, Jr., appeals from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of forcible rape, Section 566.030 RSMo 2000, forcible sodomy, Section 566.060 RSMo 2000, first-degree burglary, Section 569.160 RSMo 2000, felonious restraint, Section 565.120 RSMo 2000, and two counts of armed criminal action, Section 571.015 RSMo 2000. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Harold D. Isaac, Jr., appeals from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of forcible rape, Section 566.030 RSMo 2000, forcible sodomy, Section 566.060 RSMo 2000, first-degree burglary, Section 569.160 RSMo 2000, felonious restraint, Section 565.120 RSMo 2000, and two counts of armed criminal action, Section 571.015 RSMo 2000. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Isaac, 314 S.W.3d 348, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 264 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

314 S.W.3d 348 (State v. Isaac) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.