State v. Irons

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Irons

17 S.W.3d 574, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 578, 2000 WL 460442

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 25, 2000

DocketNo. ED 75484

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 17 S.W.3d 574 (State v. Irons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Irons, 17 S.W.3d 574, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 578, 2000 WL 460442 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Johnathon Irons, was charged, tried before a jury and convicted of assault in the first degree, Section 565.050 RSMo 1994, armed criminal action, Section 571.015 RSMo 1994, and burglary in the first degree, Section 569.190, RSMo 1994. Defendant was sentenced to terms of twenty-five years for the assault and twenty-five years for the armed criminal action to be served consecutively. Defendant was also sentenced to a term of fifteen years for the burglary to be served concurrently with the two prior sentences.

We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal and find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a brief memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgments of the trial court in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Johnathon Irons, was charged, tried before a jury and convicted of assault in the first degree, Section 565.050 RSMo 1994, armed criminal action, Section 571.015 RSMo 1994, and burglary in the first degree, Section 569.190, RSMo 1994. Defendant was sentenced to terms of twenty-five years for the assault and twenty-five years for the armed criminal action to be served consecutively. Defendant was also sentenced to a term of fifteen years for the burglary to be served concurrently with the two prior sentences.

We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal and find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a brief memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgments of the trial court in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 S.W.3d 574, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 578, 2000 WL 460442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-irons-moctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack