State v. Irish

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Irish

869 So. 2d 865, 2004 La. LEXIS 1122, 2004 WL 905620

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Irish. Read the opinion of the Court — 807 So. 2d 208 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 2, 2004·No. No. 2003-KP-1810·Published

Opinion

In re Irish, Daniel T.; — Defendant; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 186,209;

Writ granted; case remanded. The district court’s judgment denying relator’s pro se application for post-conviction relief is vacated, and the district court is directed to give counsel reasonable opportunity to prepare and litigate expeditiously a supplemental application for post-conviction relief. See State ex rel. Hampton v. State, 00-2523 (La.8/31/01), 795 So.2d 1198.

TRAYLOR, J., would deny the writ. KNOLL, J., would deny the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Irish, Daniel T.; — Defendant; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 186,209;

Writ granted; case remanded. The district court’s judgment denying relator’s pro se application for post-conviction relief is vacated, and the district court is directed to give counsel reasonable opportunity to prepare and litigate expeditiously a supplemental application for post-conviction relief. See State ex rel. Hampton v. State, 00-2523 (La.8/31/01), 795 So.2d 1198.

TRAYLOR, J., would deny the writ. KNOLL, J., would deny the writ.

State v. Irish, 869 So. 2d 865, 2004 La. LEXIS 1122, 2004 WL 905620 (La. 2004).

Pincite

869 So. 2d 865 (State v. Irish) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related