State v. International & Great Northern Railroad

68 S.W. 534, 29 Tex. Civ. App. 149, 1902 Tex. App. LEXIS 250
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. International & Great Northern Railroad. Read the opinion of the Court — 31 Tex. Civ. App. 219
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 23, 1902·Published

Opinion

FISHER, Chief Justice.

This is an action by the State against the railroad company to recover penalties arising from an alleged violation of article 4517 of the Revised Statutes, which reads as follows: “Every such company shall have a good and sufficient brake upon the hindmost car of all trains transporting passengers and merchandise, and also permanently stationed there a trusty and faithful brakeman, under a penalty of not exceeding $100 for each offense, to be recovered by suit in the "name of the State.”

The complaint made in the petition is to the effect that this law was not complied with by the appellee in the operation of its passenger trains only. The facts alleged in the petition were substantially proven. The *150 trial court, as shown in its conclusions of law, held that the statute in question applied to trains carrying passengers and merchandise, and did not' apply to trains which exclusively carried passengers, or in other words, passenger trains.

We are of the opinion that this is a correct construction of the statute. It is needless to state our views upon this question, as they are in keeping with what is said in Railway v. Shelton, 58 S. W. Rep., 179; Railway v. Campbell, 45 S. W. Rep., 2; and Railway v. Schloss, 23 S. W. Rep., 1014.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Writ of error refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. International & Great Northern Railroad, 68 S.W. 534, 29 Tex. Civ. App. 149, 1902 Tex. App. LEXIS 250 (Tex. Ct. App. 1902).

68 S.W. 534 (State v. International & Great Northern Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. Campbell
43 L.R.A. 225 (Texas Supreme Court, 1898)
Bovet v. Holzgraft
23 S.W. 1014 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1893)