State v. Inhabitants of Madison

33 Me. 267
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 1, 1851
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 33 Me. 267 (State v. Inhabitants of Madison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Inhabitants of Madison, 33 Me. 267 (Me. 1851).

Opinion

Howard, J., orally.

— The defendants raised a question of law, growing out of the records, and requested the Judge to. decide it, and to decide it in their favor. He decided it, but decided it in favor of the State. Having made this request, that the Judge would adjudicate upon the law, they cannot now object that he did so. If the request was not a recognition of bis right, it was at least an assent, on their part, that he should exercise the power of deciding. They, however, are not precluded from objecting to the soundness of the instruction. Such an objection they have accordingly urged. But we think it is not well founded. Whatever of irregularity might be pointed out as to the preliminary proceedings by the County Commissioners, their final adjudication, like other judgments of courts, are to be held valid, until reversed upon legal process.

Exceptions overruled, and case remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Howard v. State
41 S.E. 654 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 Me. 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-inhabitants-of-madison-me-1851.