State v. Ingram

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Ingram

882 S.W.2d 764, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1387, 1994 WL 463892

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 30, 1994·No. No. 64921·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after a jury convicted him of unlawful possession of a concealable firearm, in violation of § 571.070, RSMo 1986. We find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion in this ease. Therefore, we affirm by written summary order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after a jury convicted him of unlawful possession of a concealable firearm, in violation of § 571.070, RSMo 1986. We find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion in this ease. Therefore, we affirm by written summary order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.

State v. Ingram, 882 S.W.2d 764, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1387, 1994 WL 463892 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

882 S.W.2d 764 (State v. Ingram) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.