State v. Ingram

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Ingram

157 So. 3d 1101, 2014 WL 5092957

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedOctober 10, 2014

DocketNo. 2014-KK-0896

StatusPublished

This text of 157 So. 3d 1101 (State v. Ingram) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ingram, 157 So. 3d 1101, 2014 WL 5092957 (La. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Granted. The order of the court of appeal is reversed and the trial court’s ruling granting defendant’s motion to suppress is reinstated as well within the court’s broad discretion to make credibility determinations rationally based on the evidence presented at the suppression hearing. State v. Vessell, 450 So.2d 938, 943 (La.1984) (credibility determinations made by a trial court on a motion to suppress, “like all questions of fact, [are] entitled to great weight and will not be disturbed unless clearly contrary to the evidence.”) (citations omitted).

GUIDRY, J., dissents and would deny the writ. CLARK, J., dissents and would deny the writ.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Granted. The order of the court of appeal is reversed and the trial court’s ruling granting defendant’s motion to suppress is reinstated as well within the court’s broad discretion to make credibility determinations rationally based on the evidence presented at the suppression hearing. State v. Vessell, 450 So.2d 938, 943 (La.1984) (credibility determinations made by a trial court on a motion to suppress, “like all questions of fact, [are] entitled to great weight and will not be disturbed unless clearly contrary to the evidence.”) (citations omitted).

GUIDRY, J., dissents and would deny the writ. CLARK, J., dissents and would deny the writ.'

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 So. 3d 1101, 2014 WL 5092957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ingram-la-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack